Journal article
2017
APA
Click to copy
Irby, B. J., Boswell, J. N., Hewitt, K. K., Lynch, J., Abdelrahman, N., & Jeong, S. (2017). The mentoring relationship.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Irby, Beverly J., Jennifer N. Boswell, Kimberly Kappler Hewitt, Julianne Lynch, Nahed Abdelrahman, and S. Jeong. “The Mentoring Relationship” (2017).
MLA
Click to copy
Irby, Beverly J., et al. The Mentoring Relationship. 2017.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{beverly2017a,
title = {The mentoring relationship},
year = {2017},
author = {Irby, Beverly J. and Boswell, Jennifer N. and Hewitt, Kimberly Kappler and Lynch, Julianne and Abdelrahman, Nahed and Jeong, S.}
}
This issue of the Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning Journal includes research from scholars representing Turkey and the United States (California, Connecticut, Florida, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Oregon, Texas, and Utah). The authors of each manuscript present unique research focused on mentorship with principals, doctoral and undergraduate students, K-12 students, professional scientists, and novice teachers. In this editorial, we focus on the benefits and characteristics of successful mentoring relationships. Mentorship can be an invaluable component of training programs as mentorship allows students and new professionals the space to grow both personally and professionally. The mentoring relationship is at the core of a successful mentoring experience. This relationship helps cultivate more effective communication skills, movement toward application of theoretical concepts and knowledge, healthy relationships with peers, critical thinking skills, self-sufficiency, and a deep understanding of professional identity and role (Ngara & Ngwarai, 2012; Taylor & Neimeyer, 2009; Vespia, 2006). A successful mentor is someone who is (a) available to the mentee for guidance and advice, (b) consistent, (c) consistent in his or her feedback, (d) professional both within and outside the mentoring relationship, and (e) resourceful and reliable (Price, 2004). In 2002, Dedrick and Watson explored the current body of mentoring literature through the use of content analysis. In their examination of the research at that time, Dedrick and Watson, found that many researchers in the mentoring field spent a significant amount of time on issues related to mentoring, how to conduct and develop a mentoring relationship, and access and barriers to mentoring (2002). Since the Dedrick and Watson study was published there has been an increase in the number of publications where researchers have moved their focus to more specifically address strategies and information related to successful mentoring relationships between students and their respective mentors. The articles within this issue of Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning continue this trend by exploring the dynamic relationship between mentors and mentees. In their article, Designing an E-mentoring Program for Novice Teachers in Turkey and Investigating Online Interactions and Program Outcomes, Alemadag and Erdem developed an innovative e-mentoring program for new teachers and their mentors. The authors sought to explore the different types and depth of interactions along with identified mentoring benefits from both the mentor and mentee perspective. Alemadag and Erdem’s findings suggest that mentors engaged in e-mentoring relationships dedicate a significant amount of time and energy to their online interactions with their mentees as a means to provide support, guidance, and solutions for mentee concerns. Additionally, perceived satisfaction of e-mentoring was increased when the goals and expectations of the relationship were clarified from the beginning. The authors identify a number of suggestions that can help increase the satisfaction of e-mentoring relationships.